Ruling Jolts Even Saudis: 200 Lashes for Rape Victim by Rasheed Abou-Alsamh
Read the Article at NYTimes.com

“For a woman to be in seclusion with a man who is not her husband or a relative is a crime in Saudi Arabia, whose legal code is based on a strict Wahhabi interpretation of Islamic law.”
For a country that extols the “separation between church and state,” we’ve remained exceptionally quiet about the danger of Sharia law. A brief description of some components of Sharia law (which is based almost DIRECTLY from religious texts. Do not think for one second this is an inherently peaceful religion):
1. Theft is punished by imprisonment or amputation of hands or feet.
- Quran 5:38: As to the thief, Male or female, cut off his or her hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and Allah is Exalted in power.
2. Adulterers are stoned to death. In the religious texts, only the female is given the death sentence.
- Sahih Bukhari, Book 82: He said, "My son was a laborer working for this man and he committed an illegal sexual intercourse with his wife, and I gave one-hundred sheep and a slave as a ransom for my son's sin. Then I asked a learned man about this case and he informed me that my son should receive one hundred lashes and be exiled for one year, and the man's wife should be stoned to death." The Prophet said, "By Him in Whose Hand my soul is, I will judge you according to the Laws of Allah. Your one-hundred sheep and the slave are to be returned to you, and your son has to receive one-hundred lashes and be exiled for one year. O Unais! Go to the wife of this man, and if she confesses, then stone her to death." Unais went to her and she confessed. He then stoned her to death.
3. Single “fornicators” will be lashed a minimum of 100 Times. In this article, the victim of rape will be lashed 200 times and sentenced to 6 months in prison.
- Quran 24:2: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
4. Those who renounce Islam for another religion must die.
-Bukhari, volume 9, #17: Narrated Abdullah Allah's Messenger said, "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Messenger, cannot be shed except in three cases: in Qisas (equality in punishment) for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (Apostate) and leaves the Muslims."
"The woman and the former boyfriend were originally sentenced to 90 lashes each for being together in private, while the attackers received sentences ranging from 10 months to five years in prison, and 80 to 1,000 lashes each.
Mr. Lahem appealed the attackers’ sentences, saying that they were too lenient and that the treatment of the victim was too harsh. In its new decision issued Tuesday, the court increased the victim’s sentence to 200 lashes and six months in jail."
This woman, raped in a society where the victim is also then the perpetrator, is further humiliated and debased, further punished and TORTURED. Where are the democrats who had a fit when Mr. Mukasey refused to condemn waterboarding as torture (thereby subjecting several members of the military to judicial scrutiny) without having full access to top-secret documents? This woman is guilty of nothing more than wanting pictures of herself back from an ex-boyfriend. She’s not a terrorist plotting to kill the infidel, building roadside bombs, or organizing the next 9/11. And her discomfort isn’t “simulated” (waterboarding is “simulated drowning”); it is very real. Where is the left’s tirade of angry protests? Why are they not barraging the government of Saudi Arabia with floods of messages condemning this common sentence as torture, or going to the media as they did with Mr. Mukasey? In fact, where is their condemnation of integrating radical Islamic law into government in the first place? The fact is they’re too oblivious and too politically correct to EVER mention it. While members of the right realize the gravity of the situation in the Middle East, where millions are oppressed and killed in the name of Allah, the left is too busy exploiting issues like torture for political gain. Don’t believe me? Read Marc Santora’s article about it today here. Republicans are depicted with a bloodthirstiness that is quite misdirected.
“Lashing is a common sentence under the Saudi penal code, applied for crimes ranging from homosexuality and drinking alcohol to theft and adultery. Usually, lashes are meted out in increments because offenders could not survive hundreds of lashes at once. The administrator of the punishment is supposed to hold a Koran under his arm so he cannot swing the whip too fiercely; lashes are not supposed to leave permanent scars. The sentence is frequently delivered in public, often at the entrance to a jail.”
I’m totally aghast. The victim will be physically tortured and it will be done in public. This woman’s body was violated and her psyche forever traumatized, yet her naked body will bleed in front of a jail with thousands of eyes around her. The public is also one that will likely ostracize her not only because she spoke to a man that’s not her husband or relative, but also because her rape signifies she wasn't a virgin before marriage. This abhorrent and nauseating patriarchal ideology, probably existent only because of the males’ fragile egos and shortcomings (if you know what I mean), has long been denounced here in the United States as sexist. Yet once again, a complete silence resonates from the “feminists” of the United States, whose agendas have become more closely intertwined with abortion “rights” than actually promoting improvements for the welfare of their sisters.

5 comments:
WOW!!! Spot on!!!
It is the culture of political correctness (cultural Marxism)which has silenced us and blinded us from seeing reality and evil when it exists.
The only response the Left can give to your argument on this matter is a culturally relative one..."Well the Torah says adulterers should be stoned, etc." However, this is intellectually dishonest, for it does not deny the evil associated with the actual topic - the abuse of women under Sharia law mandated by Islamic holy texts, tradition, and 1400 years of Islamic jurisprudence. Furthermore, Judaism and Christinity, unlike Islam, have reformed and evolved over time to amessage of peace and equality. This cannot be saidfor Islam. We need to find a way to help Islamic moderates find a legitimate basis for their moderate views in order to change the culture of violence and oppression that Islam has had over the last 1400 years. This is a tall order, for it goes against the teachings of the Qur'an to do so,and the Islamists are the ones in power. However, it truly is the only solution. The first sep is exposing this,and you ahve succeeded greatly. Keep up the great work! Spread the truth!!!
I personally disagree with the shari'a law too, however, I think your second argument is needs to be reinforced (you would need other verses to support it):
"Adulterers are stoned to death. In the religious texts, only the female is given the death sentence."
"Only the female is given the death sentence" denotes that if a man commits the [same] crime, he wouldn't be punished as harshly.
In the given example, the woman is MARRIED and status of the man is unknown. The man committed a sex sin while the woman committed adultery and cheated on her husband (this, assuming she agreed on having sex with the man. (In any case i'm against stoning her or even punishing her. I think the man should just leave her, she's free to do whatever she wants at that point.))
In order to support your argument, and get it to be complete, you will have to state the fact that a man can "marry" multiple women. Which means he's "cheating" on his first one.
The rest of the argument is clear at that point.
Very interesting article. People need to know what's happening in those countries.
For daring to speak out her sentence was increased from 90 to 200 lashes plus 6 months in jail, and the lawyer's license to practice was suspended. Sounds like Islamo-fascism to me. OOPS! We're not allowed to say that in the US, it's "hate speech", and offends some people.
The good news is the headline- and that some brave souls are speaking out. Bravo to them, we need more!
Fools,don't just glance through what's written.Read it carefully.
1.Theft=you have to steal more than certain fixed amount to receive that punishment.
The result of this punishment is only 3-4 people are convicted of this crime in 10 years.
In the west 10,000 people are convicted and had to spend their life in prison for the rest of their life(prison term sometimes extending to more than 40 years at times.)Suicide rate as a result of these punishment is high among inmates.So in 10 yrs there are 100 deaths(through suicide) throughout in jails.
Similar is the case with other things.You have to look at things with scientific frame of mind.
I must admit we can't have these laws here because every third person is a thief.We have to issue a warning of 3-4 years.When the crime falls.Then we may use the law.
Does anyone doubt that if we didn't have to depend on Saudi oil they would be a pariah state, slammed with trade sanctions and worse? The only reason this goes unchallenged is because they hold the keys to the pipeline.
Post a Comment